Wednesday, October 31, 2007

WHICH COMES FIRST?

While anti-depressants seem to be the first treatment of choice requested by patients who are bombarded by television and magazine ads, research over the past decade plus, has reported the most effective treatment overall for depression is a combination of both medications and talk therapy, rather than either meds or therapy alone. Mind you, most folk do not read the research, yet they do absorb the ads, and therefore make their choice for meds. After all, pills and / or capsules present as certainly quicker and easier, when and if they are effective.
Many of us remember, from the popular press’ reportage a decade or so ago, about a large number of suicides by those taking a then popular anti-depressant. These powerful and popular drugs are not always effective. As a clinician, I have heard, for want of a better cliché, horror stories about adverse reactions to anti-depressants. I am also aware, that frequently, when several anti-depressants are tried and fail, that the next line of treatment is electroshock therapy.
Anti-depressant medications seem to be miracles for severely depressed people with what is likely to be a genetic and genuine depression—in the olden days, it was called endogenous, meaning inner, in terms of being in the body, rather than—again, in the olden days—exogenous, meaning outside the body.
While the terms might not be used any longer, the distinction between an inner or genetic depression, and an outer or environment-caused depression exists. Reactive depression can be caused by another’s death, a job loss, a divorce, an ending of a relationship / friendship, a lack of physical activity, a lack of activity in general, a narrowing of one’s life to few or no interests, a lack of involvement in one’s own life that reflects back as helplessness / hopelessness.
You may have noted that my list began with possible causes for depression, and moved on to what might be thought of as symptoms of depression. They are both / and. Please read on.
Dr Beck—please see earlier blog--created a self-inventory to screen for depression, which you can find on his web site. Some of the questions ask if you, the one taking the inventory, have lost pleasure in people, places, things and activities which formerly brought you pleasure. Mental health clinicians routinely ask folk coming for treatment if they have lost interest in or no longer enjoy what used to be pleasurable for them. This lack of pleasure phenomenon is called anhedonia. It encompasses the hopelessness and helplessness not only of Beck’s dogs, but of people who describe their depression as paralysis—please see earlier blog.
Now back to my above paragraph summing up the possible causes of reactive depression as also sounding like symptoms people describe as their depression.
Point being, to my mind, which came first, the inactivity or the depression?
I believe it is both /and. If one’s depression is a lifelong malaise which deepens over time to become unbearable, depression likely came first. Medication and therapy likely work. I also wonder, however, if this lifelong depression might not be learned from family members who model anhedonia, narrow lifestyles and inactivity, rather than inherited from one’s gene pool.
If the depression results from a negative life event, it is likely that a person’s coping skills, being pushed to the max and more, lead to feelings of helplessness and hopelessness, along with a narrowing of interests and a lack of pleasure. I think that perhaps the inactivity exacerbates feelings of loss, lack of pleasure and so on, and that therapy and exercise will be most effective.
The newest research gives accolades to exercise once again, as being not only beneficial both as prophylaxis and as treatment for diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, obesity, and cancer, but also for depression.
University of California, Berkeley’s November 2007 issue cites a “growing body of research” reporting that depressed people improved with several months of supervised “cardio-fitness” programs, when they had not responded positively to anti-depressants. Remember, the usual protocol when depressed people do not respond to several anti-depressants is electroshock treatment.
This particular article did not designate if the depression was lifelong or reactive depression, calling the malaise major depression. Either way, the fact that activity lifted the malaise is positive. The researchers credited both the change in brain chemistry created by activity and the phenomenon of getting a depressed person out of life-narrowing isolation and giving him / her a sense of accomplishment.
If depression plagues you, make room in your life for exercise and
life-expanding activity.
Please go to Mayo Clinic’s website for more information—their research includes exercise as beneficial for anxiety—and I shall write on that soon.

Monday, October 15, 2007

DR BECK'S DOGS AND DEPRESSION

I genuinely planned on having this piece on my blog for the past two weeks in order to honor 11October as National Depression Screening Day-- however life intervened.
Nonetheless, depression is. Every day. So I am adding some background and cetera to the statistical and cetera on my web site.
First, the very word depression derives from the French word d’espere, meaning without hope, or espere, in French. The very power of someone’s being without hope qualified it as one of the Seven Deadly Sins in the early Church. The Sin was called Sloth, and meant an apathy so great that someone experiencing it would actually take his or her own life, rather than feel for a single moment longer that profound hopelessness.
It is toward preventing that possibility of a life taken by its owner, that so many mental health professionals commit themselves—including Dr Beck.
A decade or two ago, Aaron Temkin Beck, MD—please go to his web site to see all he is still doing / involved in, including being Director of the Center for the Treatment and Prevention of Suicide at the University of Pennsylvania--conducted an experiment with dogs in order to re-create the human response to helplessness / hopelessness.
Following is what I remember from my graduate school readings of Beck’s experiment, because it affected me so profoundly in having a glimmer of what deeply depressed people experience that might lead them to a helplessness so great they would take their own lives.
Beck’s experiment began with dogs in containers. The dogs were administered electric shocks on a frequent basis. When the dogs endeavored to escape, by lunging at the container doors, they fell back, as the doors locked. Over time, the dogs stopped trying to escape the shocks, stopped trying to get out the doors, and lay down in the corners of the boxes, behaving listlessly, with no interest in food or movement or people.
In the second part of Beck’s experiment, he brought in a control group of dogs, along with the dogs in the original experiment. As before, electric shocks were administered. However, this time, the doors on the boxes were unlocked.
The control group dogs, upon receiving the first shock, knocked open the doors of their boxes and escaped.
And the dogs who had previously been unable to escape locked doors did not even attempt to break out through unlocked doors, but rather retired to their corners as listlessly as before.
As I remember, Beck and his team hypothesized that the original dogs’ observable helplessness to escape, and their non-active behavior exemplified human depression, with its self-described apathy, inactivity, and sense of hopelessness.
Clients over the years have described their severe depression as a “paralysis” making the simplest every day tasks, such as showering, combing hair, brushing teeth, getting out of bed as impossible.
I encourage anyone feeling depressed to go online and take the Beck Depression Inventory, as well as the Mayo Clinic Depression Inventory. Please, if according to the inventories, you believe you are depressed, I encourage you to first seek a licensed Psychologist or licensed master’s level clinician—Social Worker or Marriage Family Therapist for counseling. If you and your therapist decide it would be beneficial, then make an appointment with a Psychiatrist for medication management.
Research over the past decade reports that treatment with both therapy and medication is more effective than either therapy or medication alone for those with depression severe enough to benefit from medication.
I will be writing more on depression next week.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

WHAT LOVE IS / WHAT LOVE IS NOT

WHAT LOVE IS / WHAT LOVE IS NOT

I was recently asked to submit an article to a magazine on the topic of this blog’s title, and I am now re-writing the piece for said blog.
Just think for a moment, about all the different kinds of love each of us is involved in. Between parent and child, filial, among siblings and friends, fraternal, towards god(s) / goddess(s), and towards humanity, agape, and yes, love between two people, considered romantic love, and called eros.
Erotic love, then. Awesome. And how does that intense, powerful, overwhelming “love” transfer into marriage, children, a lifetime partnership and…?
I was asked to write about romantic love for the magazine, and I shall repeat that theme here, with variations.
Example: St Paul in I Corinthians of the Christian Bible, says that “love is patient and kind; it is not jealous or conceited or proud;…love does not keep a record of wrongs…” In reality, Paul is talking about God’s love toward humans, and our love towards all other humans, agape. Yet I am not alone in believing his thoughts also apply aptly to love between two people.
Working with couples for twenty-five years in my private practice, I would say that negative variations on Paul’s words comprise a pretty fair compendium of couples’ issues which they bring to therapy. And, while I do not actually work with couples towards Paul’s specific words, I happily acknowledge that the basic goals expressed in Paul are ideals my clients strive for.
Example: Kahlil Gibran shares a definite and repeated message about marriage / romantic love in The Prophet , that two who love each other deeply and dearly do well to maintain a distance between them.
A few quotes from Kahlil follow: “…let the winds of the heavens dance between you…drink not from the same cup…eat not from the same loaf…stand together yet not too near together: For the pillars of the temple stand apart…”
What a lovely metaphor! Can you visualize a temple roof tipping and sliding off two pillars joined two closely together? Nor can a couple hold up their myriad commitments if they are “joined at the hip”. the temple over two pillars joined together, all tips and slides into uselessness and chaos.
Then, again for the magazine piece, I asked several friends—who are also couples—to tell me what they think love is and what love is not.
Example: love is a smile from your heart, a gift; love is not a reward; love is sharing space; love is not intrusive; love is a connection with constant flowing energy; love is not hasty, rude, selfish, egocentric nor hard to attain; love is living your life for someone and enjoying every minute; love is neither guarantee nor destination; love is seeing that sparkle in your beloved’s eyes when he / she sees you; love is not disappointing your beloved; love is recognizing your partner’s world of experience; love is not a goal.
Thank you friends, for your thoughtful sharing.
I have a few thoughts on love myself. I believe that love is a choice. I believe that love is a partnership. I believe that love is based on respect.
Choice. Yes, we all want that feeling of bliss, euphoria, chemistry, perhaps a tad of “out-of-my-mindness” that falling in love / lust showers upon us.
I believe that this lovely feeling is the opposite of choice—which means sticking it out no matter what—ill children keeping us up through the night, job loss, financial reverses, each of us stepping up to the plate not only to weather the tough times, but to stand together to make the future as “better-est” as we are able.
I also believe that when we choose to love we choose to become a partner. Creating and accomplishing goals together, setting decisions forth jointly, agreeing to disagree when necessary—think about how much harder to blame or point fingers at each other when you have been working together as partners all along.
I believe that mutual respect is a necessity in a loving relationship, the ballast, the gravitas, the roots that let love soar.